Now, speaking about sub clocks means pointing straight to a class of timepieces that's normally used for even ten percent of its possible.
What good is it to get the best, which for him to dive to over 1,000 meters of depth would be as simple as "drinking a glass of water", if the individual has secured his wrist to the max after a dip and a few strokes, return instantly to lounge under the umbrella?
If this is their principal use it's merely the fault of old habits at least as much as the debut of the so-called divers of the contemporary age that dates back to the center of the previous century.
The incorrigible desire to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three decades later, in 1953, Blancpain invented the Fifty Fathoms, one of the most iconic timepieces the category can boast, has been tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to challenge the depths of their well-identified abysses in "The Silent World", a famous documentary -movie also winner of an Oscar award.
Continuing, I feel that even non-fans will remember well among the very first Rolex Submariner look several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the movie Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied to his wrist due to his fabric strap became a legend. It turned out to be a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to understand each other without the crown shield shoulders, imitated a little by everyone.
These are only two of the first cases that reveal how - fiction or reality - for more than fifty years the press - driven by the watch sector - decided that the diver watches ought to be the first to personify the idea of man-adventure. Maybe it is also from that day the brands when it came to describing their versions began to use the phrase: "suitable for any event".
The 007 change, sadly also the mythical "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all of the mechanisms of the most well-known spy in the world, and clearly also the opinion whose role has been played with the Omega Seamaster for several years.
But beyond their actual use within this massive family whose origins would simply deal with "hard even greater than steel", now there are also versions so bejeweled to fear even once you have to wash the hands.
But a real diver's watch has normally always had a whole lot to say technically speaking. Let's just mention the features and constructive philosophies of these references.
I've a long-standing friend who's an expert diver and who, during his diving at the Persian Gulf, makes 100% of his diving watch - including that valve to get the escape of gaseous mixtures which are breathed at high depths.
A real wrist sub Has to Be able to ensure the following performances:
Fantastic visibility throughout the dive
A protection against magnetic fields superior to the standard
Resistance to impact and salt water
Accurate verification of the performance of the device that reports the dive time
An in-depth test of the efficacy of its motion, either mechanical or quartz
However, the tests didn't end here: today professional diving watches must adhere to certain rules like those described by ISO 6425.
For a common mortal usage, that which we all know is the greatest, the best sub may be ultimately a watchable to offer features considerably milder and easier to handle.
I remember that in order to only immerse the surface at maximum security, a timepiece should be certified to withstand a pressure of at least 5 ATM (approximately 50 meters), which appears to be redundant, but that is not so when it's done a trivial swim in the sea. It would be better to prevent diving, particularly if ours could not even count on a screw-on crown better still when protected on the sides by the classic two shoulders.
Along with the security on the waterproof status of the underwater timepieces?
Just for people who would never use them for specialist purposes the ideal is to be able to rely on a device that visually signals on the dial in case the crown isn't completely screwed, as well as the watch is therefore in a clear condition of non-security.
Sadly, this is the primary reason why an abyssal super dip watch may have to be rushed to a service centre, prior to seawater entering risks compromising any mechanism forever. This function currently exists, however on hardly any models, which frankly I best dive watches under 100 don't understand why.
You might have worn out your diving diver's watch on your wrist in order to go to the sea and consequently, after correcting the time, have forgotten to screw the crown tightly. It's by far the most common case.
TIP - As soon as you've worn the costume pick on the fly either leave your diver somewhere safe, or obligatorily create a closing but basic check on the tightening of the winding crown.
Now that we have seen together a little 'of problems related to the time that must satisfy with the water, and also given the necessary advice, I reveal you which - at least to date - are for me the best dive watches.
They're not many: I've split them into two categories. The order in which they appear does not signify any position.